AI Governance & Law — 788 Nodes
- A Plan for Global Engagement on AI Standards
Recognizing the importance of technical standards in shaping development and use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the President’s October 2023 Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of… - Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations
This NIST Trustworthy and Responsible AI report develops a taxonomy of concepts and defines terminology in the field of adversarial machine learning (AML). The taxonomy is built on surveying the AML literature and is… - Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations
This NIST Trustworthy and Responsible AI report develops a taxonomy of concepts and defines terminology in the field of adversarial machine learning (AML), which may aid in securing applications of artificial… - African Union Continental AI Strategy - Harnessing AI for African Development and Digital Transformation
The African Union Continental AI Strategy provides a comprehensive framework for AU Member States to develop and implement national AI policies that are inclusive, ethical, and drive socio-economic development. It… - AI Action Summit Paris - Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable AI for People and the Planet (February 11, 2025)
The AI Action Summit hosted in Paris by France co-chaired with India on February 10-11, 2025 produced the Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable Artificial Intelligence for People and the Planet, signed by 60 countries… - AI Guidelines for Business 2024 - Hiroshima AI Process Friendly Framework
These voluntary guidelines from Japan's METI and MIC provide a risk-based, agile framework for all businesses developing, providing, or using AI. They establish ten core principles, outlined in Chapter 2 'Common Guiding… - AI Guidelines for Business 2024 - METI and Cabinet Office Principles: Transparency, Safety, Fairness and Accountability for AI Developers
These non-binding guidelines from Japan's METI and Cabinet Office establish ten core principles for all businesses developing, providing, or using AI, promoting a risk-based, human-centric approach. The guidelines,… - AI Red Teaming (NIST AI 100-4)
Adversarial red teaming constitutes a mandatory control for designated AI systems, aligning with directives in U.S. Executive Order 14110 and fulfilling the accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity requirements detailed… - AI regulation: a pro-innovation approach
This white paper sets out the UK government’s proposals for a pro-innovation, cross-sectoral approach to AI regulation based on five high-level principles to be implemented by existing regulators. It does not establish… - AI Safety Institute: approach to evaluations
The UK AI Safety Institute (AISI) framework outlines its approach to evaluating advanced AI models for national security and societal risks, focusing on five capabilities: misuse, societal impacts, autonomous systems,… - AI System Impact & Risk Assessment (ISO/IEC 42001:2023)
The AI System Impact Assessment (Clause 6.1.2) is a mandatory requirement to identify, analyze, and evaluate the potential consequences of an AI system on individuals, groups, and society, focusing on fairness, privacy,… - AI Transparency & Communication (ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.8)
Transparency controls (Annex A.8) mandate the provision of clear, accessible information regarding the AI system’s intent, capabilities, and limitations to ensure stakeholders can make informed decisions. - AIMS Improvement (ISO 42001)
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10 (Improvement) mandates that organizations operating an AI Management System (AIMS) establish systematic processes for identifying, addressing, and preventing nonconformities - including AI… - AIMS Performance Eval (ISO 42001)
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9 (Performance Evaluation) requires organizations operating an AI Management System (AIMS) to establish monitoring and measurement programs for AI systems and the AIMS itself, conduct internal… - Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2023
Requires entities deploying high-impact automated decision systems (ADS) to conduct impact assessments evaluating risks of algorithmic discrimination, data quality, and system transparency. Applies to operators of ADS… - America's AI Action Plan - Three-Pillar Federal Strategy (July 2025)
America's AI Action Plan, published July 2025 by OSTP, OMB, NSC and the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto pursuant to Executive Order 14179, sets US federal AI policy across three pillars: (I) Accelerate AI Innovation;… - An Act to enact the Consumer Privacy Protection Act, the Personal Information and Data Protection Tribunal Act and the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other Acts (Bill C-27), Part 3: Artificial Intelligence and Data Act
Bill C-27, Part 3 establishes the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA), which imposes obligations on persons responsible for high-impact AI systems to assess and mitigate risks of harm and biased output, conduct… - Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) 2023 - AI Safety Levels (ASL-2/ASL-3/ASL-4), Capability Thresholds Triggering Enhanced Safeguards, Deployment Restrictions at ASL-3, Third-Party Evaluations, Commitments to Model Cards and Interpretability Research
Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy establishes an AI Safety Level (ASL) framework to manage catastrophic risks from increasingly capable AI systems, requiring enhanced safety, security, and operational standards as… - Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (Version 2.1, Effective 31 March 2025) - AI Safety Level Standards (ASL-2 Current Baseline; ASL-3 Required for Capability Thresholds in CBRN and Autonomous AI R&D); Capability Thresholds, Required Safeguards, and Governance Framework
Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy version 2.1, effective 31 March 2025, is Anthropic PBC's public commitment not to train or deploy models capable of causing catastrophic harm unless safety and security measures keep… - Argentina Decisión Administrativa 899/2024 (Mesa Interministerial de IA) and AAIP Resolución 161/2023 (Programa Nacional de Transparencia y Protección de Datos Personales en el Uso de IA)
Argentina's national AI governance framework is structured through two operational instruments: (1) Decisión Administrativa 750/2023 of 7 September 2023 created the Mesa Interministerial de Inteligencia Artificial… - Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Assessment of the Robustness of Neural Networks - Part 1: Overview
This technical report provides an overview of existing methods to assess the robustness of neural networks, focusing on formal verification and statistical testing approaches. It applies to developers, evaluators, and… - Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) - Bill C-27 High-Impact AI System Obligations, Audits and ATIP Commissioner Role
Canada's Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA), part of Bill C-27, mandates that persons responsible for a high-impact AI system must establish measures to identify, assess, and mitigate risks of harm or biased… - Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) - Bill C-27 Part 3 (2022)
This Act requires persons responsible for high-impact AI systems in Canadian interprovincial or international trade to establish measures for risk identification and mitigation, monitoring, data anonymization, and… - Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
The goal of the AI RMF is to offer a resource to the organizations designing, developing, deploying, or using AI systems to help manage the many risks of AI and promote trustworthy and responsible development and use of… - Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0): Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile
This NIST profile extends the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to address the unique risks of generative AI, requiring organizations to identify, assess, and manage threats such as data poisoning,… - Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0): MANAGE Function - Risk Response, Treatment, and Incident Planning
The NIST AI RMF MANAGE function requires organizations to develop and implement plans for responding to and recovering from identified AI risks, including prioritizing risk responses, treating residual risks, and… - Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0): MAP Function - AI Risk Contextualization and Prioritization
The NIST AI RMF MAP function requires organizations to establish the context to frame AI risks by identifying system purposes, scope, potential impacts, and relevant stakeholders. This foundational step, detailed in AI… - Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile
This document is a cross-sectoral profile of and a companion resource for the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) for Generative AI, developed pursuant to Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy… - ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics (endorsed February 2024) - ASEAN AI Governance Framework: Seven Principles for Responsible AI Development, Consumer Protection, Transparency and Human Oversight
This non-binding guide, endorsed at the Fourth ASEAN Digital Ministers Meeting (ADGMIN) which concluded on 2 February 2024, provides a voluntary framework for ASEAN member states and organizations, outlining seven core… - ASEAN Model AI Governance Framework Second Edition 2020 - Ethical and Accountable AI Deployment in Southeast Asia
This non-binding framework provides guidance for organizations in ASEAN member states on deploying AI systems ethically and responsibly, focusing on principles of transparency, explainability, fairness, and… - Australia AI Ethics Framework - National Principles for Ethical AI (2019) - Compliance Obligations for Australian AI Developers, Human-Centred AI Requirements, and Voluntary AI Ethics Principles for Australian Organisations
This node outlines the Australia AI Ethics Framework (2019), focusing on voluntary principles for ethical AI development. Key compliance actions include ensuring human-centered values and transparency in AI systems. - Australia National AI Plan 2025 and Voluntary AI Safety Standard - DISR Technology-Neutral Approach, Unveiled 2 December 2025
Organisations adopting AI in or affecting Australia should align with the National AI Plan 2025 unveiled by the Australian Government on 2 December 2025, coordinated by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources… - Australia Voluntary AI Safety Standard (Department of Industry, Science and Resources, August 2024)
The Australian Government Department of Industry, Science and Resources published the Voluntary AI Safety Standard on August 22, 2024. The Standard is non-mandatory practical guidance for Australian organisations… - Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework: Eight AI Ethics Principles
This voluntary framework provides eight principles to guide Australian businesses and governments in the responsible design, development, and implementation of AI. It requires organizations to ensure AI systems uphold… - Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework: Eight AI Ethics Principles
This voluntary framework establishes eight core principles for ethical AI development and deployment in Australia, applicable to all organizations designing, developing, or deploying AI systems. Key obligations include… - Automation Support for Control Assessments: Project Update and Vision
In 2017, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published a methodology for supporting the automation of Special Publication (SP) 800-53 control assessments in the form of Interagency Report (IR)… - Automation Support for Control Assessments: Project Update and Vision
NIST Interagency Report (IR) 8011 is a multi-volume series that provides a blueprint for supporting automated control assessments. It proposes an approach for creating specific tests, denominated as 'defect checks,'… - Bletchley Declaration on AI Safety - First Global AI Safety Summit (November 2023)
The Bletchley Declaration establishes a global consensus among 28 countries, including the US, UK, EU, and China, to collaboratively address frontier AI risks, particularly catastrophic risks from advanced AI systems,… - Bletchley Declaration on AI Safety - First Global AI Safety Summit (November 2023)
The Bletchley Declaration, signed on 1-2 November 2023 at Bletchley Park (United Kingdom) at the inaugural AI Safety Summit hosted by the UK government, was the first multilateral statement on frontier AI safety risks -… - Brazil AI Bill 2338/2023 (Senate) - Risk-Based Framework for Artificial Intelligence Systems
Brazilian Senate Bill 2338/2023 establishes a risk-based framework for AI systems, categorising them into excessive (prohibited), high, limited, and minimal risk tiers with specific obligations for high-risk… - Brazil Artificial Intelligence Framework (PL 2338/2023) - Federal AI Regulation Proposal
This bill establishes a risk-based framework for AI systems in Brazil, requiring providers and deployers to conduct impact assessments, implement governance measures, and ensure transparency, particularly for systems… - Brazil Artificial Intelligence Framework Bill PL 2338/2023 - Risk Classification, Transparency Requirements and National AI Authority
This regulation establishes a national framework for the use of artificial intelligence in Brazil, mandating risk classification, transparency, and accountability for AI systems. It applies to developers, deployers, and… - C2PA Content Provenance
The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) specification defines a cryptographically signed metadata manifest standard that embeds verifiable provenance information directly into digital assets… - CAC Algorithm Recommendation Measures 2022 - Provisions on the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations
The CAC Algorithm Recommendation Measures 2022 require algorithmic recommendation service providers to provide transparency, user opt-out rights, and prohibit price discrimination, as stated in Article 5. This… - California AB 2013 (2024) - Generative AI Training Data Transparency Act
California Assembly Bill 2013 (Irwin) requires developers of generative artificial intelligence systems or services made available to Californians on or after 1 January 2022 to post on their website documentation… - California AB 2655 (2024) - Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act
California Assembly Bill 2655 (Berman) - the Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024 - obliges 'large online platforms' to identify and either remove or label materially deceptive AI-generated content… - California Assembly Bill 1836 (2024) - Use of Likeness: Digital Replica of Deceased Personality (Amendment to Civil Code Section 3344.1)
California Assembly Bill 1836 was chaptered on 17 September 2024 (Stats. 2024, Chap. 258) and amends California Civil Code Section 3344.1 to create a new statutory liability for the unauthorised production,… - California Assembly Bill 2602 (2024) - Contracts Against Public Policy: Personal or Professional Services: Digital Replicas of Living Persons (Labor Code Section 927)
California Assembly Bill 2602 was approved by the Governor on 17 September 2024 (Stats. 2024, Chap. 259) and adds Section 927 to the California Labor Code. AB 2602 renders unenforceable any provision in an agreement… - California Assembly Bill 853 of 2025 - AI Transparency Act Amendments and Manifest and Latent Disclosure Obligations
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 853 on 13 October 2025, delaying the operation of the California AI Transparency Act from 1 January 2026 to 2 August 2026 (to align with the EU AI Act), expanding the… - California Bot Disclosure Law - SB 1001 (Effective July 1, 2019)
California Senate Bill 1001 (Hertzberg, 2018) was signed by Governor Brown on September 28, 2018 and took effect July 1, 2019 as the first US state law requiring bot disclosure in consumer-facing interactions. SB 1001… - California Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024 - Assembly Bill 2655 (Chapter 261 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 2655, authored by Assemblymember Berman and enacted as Chapter 261 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom on 17 September 2024 and adds Chapter 7 (Sections 20510 to 20520) to… - California Digital Replicas in Personal or Professional Services Contracts - Assembly Bill 2602 (Chapter 259 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 2602, authored by Assemblymember Kalra and enacted as Chapter 259 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom on 17 September 2024 and adds Section 927 to the California Labor Code.… - California Elections: Deceptive Media in Advertisements - Assembly Bill 2839 (Chapter 262 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 2839, authored by Assemblymember Pellerin and enacted as Chapter 262 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom as an urgency statute on 17 September 2024 and took effect… - California Generative Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act - Senate Bill 896 (Chapter 928 of 2024)
California Senate Bill 896, authored by Senator Dodd and enacted as Chapter 928 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom on 29 September 2024 and codifies key generative AI accountability measures for… - California Generative Artificial Intelligence Training Data Transparency Act - Assembly Bill 2013 (Chapter 817 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 2013, authored by Assemblymember Irwin and enacted as Chapter 817 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom on 28 September 2024 and takes effect on 1 January 2026. The Act adds… - California Health Care Services: Generative Artificial Intelligence Patient Communications - Assembly Bill 3030 (Chapter 879 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 3030 was approved by Governor Newsom on 28 September 2024 and adds Health and Safety Code Section 1339.75 et seq. requiring health facilities, clinics, physician offices and group practices to… - California Pupil Instruction: Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Curriculum Frameworks - Assembly Bill 2876 (Chapter 927 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 2876, authored by Assemblymember Berman and enacted as Chapter 927 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom on 29 September 2024 and adds California Education Code Section 33548.… - California SB 53 (Transparency in Frontier AI Act)
The nation's first comprehensive safety and transparency requirement for frontier AI developers, mandating catastrophic risk frameworks, 15-day incident reporting, and whistleblower protections for models trained above… - California SB 942 - California AI Transparency Act (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22757-22757.6)
Covered generative AI providers with over 1,000,000 monthly users or visitors must offer a free AI detection tool, embed a latent provenance disclosure in AI-generated image, video, or audio content, offer users the… - California SB 942 (2024) - California AI Transparency Act (Watermarking, Disclosures and Detection)
California Senate Bill 942 (Becker) - the California AI Transparency Act - obligates a 'covered provider' of a generative AI system with over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users that is publicly accessible within… - California Senate Bill 942 - California AI Transparency Act (Chapter 25, commencing with Section 22757, of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code) - Operative 1 January 2026
California Senate Bill 942, the 'California AI Transparency Act,' adds Chapter 25 (commencing with Section 22757) to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code and becomes operative on 1 January 2026. The Act… - California Use of Likeness: Digital Replica of Deceased Personalities - Assembly Bill 1836 (Chapter 258 of 2024)
California Assembly Bill 1836, authored by Assemblymember Bauer-Kahan and enacted as Chapter 258 of the Statutes of 2024, was signed by Governor Newsom and filed with the Secretary of State on 17 September 2024. The Act… - Canada ISED Voluntary Code of Conduct on Responsible Development and Management of Advanced Generative AI
Canada's Voluntary Code of Conduct on the Responsible Development and Management of Advanced Generative AI Systems was published by Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) Canada in September 2023 as a… - Canada Treasury Board Secretariat - Directive on Automated Decision-Making (in force April 1 2019, updated 2023, 2025)
The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) Directive on Automated Decision-Making (ADM Directive) is binding instrument-level policy for the Government of Canada governing the use of automated decision systems by… - CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2022-03 - Adverse Action Notification for Credit Decisions Based on Complex Algorithms
CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2022-03 (26 May 2022) confirms that creditors using complex algorithms, including artificial intelligence and machine learning models, must comply with the Equal Credit… - CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2023-03 - Adverse Action Notices When Using AI and Complex Credit Models
CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2023-03 (19 September 2023) builds on the 2022-03 Circular and clarifies that creditors using AI and other complex algorithmic models in credit decisions cannot satisfy the… - Chile Ley No. 21,383 (2021) Constitutional Amendment Establishing Neurorights
Ley No. 21,383 of 25 October 2021 amended Article 19 paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Chile to recognise the development of science and technology at the service of persons and to confer constitutional… - China Algorithm Recommendation Regulations 2022 (CAC) - Algorithmic Recommendation Service Providers Registration, Prohibition on Illegal Price Discrimination, Addictive Algorithm Features Disabled for Minors, Transparent Recommendation Mechanisms and User Opt-Out Rights
This regulation applies to algorithmic recommendation service providers operating in China and mandates transparency in recommendation mechanisms, prohibits illegal price discrimination, requires user opt-out rights,… - China CAC Measures for Labelling AI-Generated Synthetic Content 2025 - Explicit and Implicit Labels under GB 45438-2025
Internet information service providers and providers of online content distribution services creating AI-generated content for the China market must, from 1 September 2025, apply explicit labels to AI-generated text,… - China Global AI Governance Initiative 2023 - PRC International AI Governance Framework
The Global AI Governance Initiative (全球人工智能治理倡议, GAIGI) was released by the People's Republic of China on October 18, 2023, coinciding with the Third Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation in Beijing; the… - CISA AI Cybersecurity Collaboration Playbook 2024 - Compliance Obligations for Critical Infrastructure AI Security, AI Incident Sharing with CISA, and Collaborative AI Threat Intelligence Reporting Requirements
This node outlines obligations for critical infrastructure organizations to secure AI systems, share AI-related cyber incidents with CISA, and engage in collaborative threat intelligence reporting as per the CISA AI… - CISA-NCSC Joint Guidelines for Secure AI System Development (November 26, 2023)
On November 26, 2023 the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), with co-sealing from 21 additional international cyber agencies including ACSC… - Colombia CONPES 3975 (2019) - Política Nacional para la Transformación Digital e Inteligencia Artificial; MinCiencias 2025 Proyecto de Ley AI Framework; National AI Authority Designation
Colombia's national artificial intelligence policy framework is anchored by Documento CONPES 3975 (Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social) Política Nacional para la Transformación Digital e Inteligencia… - Colorado AI Act (SB 205) - High-Risk Systems
US state-level regulatory requirements for developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems making consequential decisions, mandating algorithmic discrimination audits and consumer opt-out rights. - Colorado Senate Bill 24-205 - Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Act (2024 Session Laws of Colorado, Effective 1 February 2026) - First US Comprehensive AI Law
Colorado Senate Bill 24-205, the 'Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence' act, signed by Governor Jared Polis on 17 May 2024 (2024 Session Laws of Colorado), is the first comprehensive United States artificial… - Connecticut SB 2 (2025) - Proposed Artificial Intelligence Act (Not Enacted; Died in the House)
Connecticut Senate Bill No. 2 of the 2025 regular session was a proposed artificial intelligence bill addressing high-risk AI deployer and developer duties and the prevention of algorithmic discrimination. It is NOT… - Constitutional AI Algorithm
Constitutional AI (CAI) is a voluntary alignment research methodology developed by Anthropic (Bai et al., 2022, arXiv:2212.08073), not a law or binding standard, that trains AI systems to be helpful, harmless, and… - Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights (CETS No. 225) 2024 - Obligations on Lifecycle, Transparency and Redress
This convention requires signatory Parties to establish legal frameworks ensuring that AI systems are designed, developed, and used in a manner consistent with human rights, democracy, and the rule of law throughout… - Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI, Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225)
The Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225), opened for signature on 5 September 2024 in Vilnius, is the world's first legally… - Deterministic RAG Verification
Deterministic RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) verification is a systematic process for cross-referencing AI-generated claims against authoritative knowledge bases to detect and block hallucinated, fabricated, or… - Digital India Act, 2023 - AI Provisions on Safe Harbour, Harmful AI, and Enforcement
The proposed Digital India Act (DIA) 2023 introduces a risk-based framework for AI regulation, imposing legal accountability on platforms deploying 'high-risk AI systems' by limiting safe harbour protections and… - Directive on Automated Decision-Making
This directive requires federal departments to assess, document, and publicly disclose the algorithmic impact of automated decision systems used in administrative decisions, ensuring transparency, human oversight, and… - Directive on Automated Decision-Making, Section 6: Requirements
Organizations must complete, publish, and regularly update an Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) for any automated decision system, provide transparent notices to clients before and meaningful explanations after a… - ENISA Guidelines on AI Cybersecurity for the EU AI Act - Compliance Obligations for EU AI System Cybersecurity Controls, AI Attack Surface Mapping, and ENISA Technical Guidelines for Article 15 Cybersecurity Requirements
This node outlines ENISA's cybersecurity guidelines for AI systems under the EU AI Act, focusing on compliance with Article 15 cybersecurity requirements, AI attack surface mapping, and multilayered security controls.… - EU AI Act - Accuracy, Robustness, and Cybersecurity Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems (Article 15)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 15 establishes mandatory accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity requirements for high-risk AI systems; Article 15(1) - high-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in… - EU AI Act - AI Regulatory Sandboxes for Innovative AI Development (Articles 57-60)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 57-60 establish the AI regulatory sandbox framework - a controlled environment enabling providers and prospective providers to develop, train, test, and validate innovative AI… - EU AI Act - Article 5 Prohibited AI Practices: Complete Framework Overview
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5 establishes eight categories of prohibited AI practices that represent the highest tier of AI risk - practices so harmful to fundamental rights, safety, and human dignity that… - EU AI Act - Authorised Representatives and Importers of High-Risk AI Systems (Articles 22-25)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 22-25 establish obligations for authorised representatives and importers who play a role in the supply chain for high-risk AI systems placed on the EU market by providers… - EU AI Act - Commission Guidelines on High-Risk AI Classification Under Article 6 (Article 96 Guidelines)
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act) Article 96 mandates the European Commission to publish guidelines on the practical implementation of Article 6 - the high-risk AI system classification rules - to assist providers… - EU AI Act - Conformity Assessment Procedures for High-Risk AI Systems (Articles 43-49)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 43-49 establish the conformity assessment framework that high-risk AI system providers must complete before placing their systems on the EU market; two conformity assessment… - EU AI Act - Data Governance Requirements for High-Risk AI Training Data (Article 10)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 10 establishes mandatory data governance requirements for training, validation, and testing datasets used in high-risk AI systems; Article 10(1) - providers must implement data… - EU AI Act - European Artificial Intelligence Board (Articles 65-68)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 65-68 establish the European Artificial Intelligence Board (AI Board) as the coordination body for consistent application of the EU AI Act across Member States; Article 65(1) -… - EU AI Act - General-Purpose AI Model Obligations (Articles 53-54)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 53-54 establish obligations for all providers of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models, regardless of whether the model poses systemic risk; Article 53(1) - providers of… - EU AI Act - General-Purpose AI Models with Systemic Risk: Classification and Additional Obligations (Articles 51, 55)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 51 establishes that a general-purpose AI (GPAI) model is classified as posing systemic risk where the cumulative amount of compute used for its training, measured in… - EU AI Act - GPAI Model Code of Practice under Article 54
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 54 establishes the GPAI model code of practice as a voluntary compliance mechanism enabling providers of general-purpose AI models to demonstrate compliance with their Article 53… - EU AI Act - GPAI Model Copyright Compliance and Training Data Summary Obligations (Article 53(1)(c)-(d))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 53(1)(c)-(d) imposes two specific obligations on providers of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models relating to copyright and training data: Article 53(1)(c) - copyright compliance… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Administration of Justice and Democratic Processes (Annex III Point 8)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 8 designates as high-risk AI systems used in the administration of justice and democratic processes, covering two distinct categories: (8a) AI systems intended to assist… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Biometric Identification and Categorisation (Annex III Point 1)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 1 designates as high-risk certain biometric AI systems - specifically (1a) AI systems intended to be used for post-remote biometric identification of natural persons… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Critical Infrastructure Safety Components (Annex III Point 2)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 2 designates as high-risk AI systems intended to be used as safety components in the management and operation of critical infrastructure, covering: (2a) AI used as safety… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Education and Vocational Training (Annex III Point 3)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 3 designates as high-risk all AI systems used in education and vocational training, covering: (3a) AI systems intended to determine access to educational institutions or… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Employment, Workers Management, and Recruitment (Annex III Point 4)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 4 designates as high-risk all AI systems used in employment, workers management, and access to self-employment, covering four categories: (4a) AI for targeted advertising… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Essential Private and Public Services (Annex III Point 5)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 5 designates as high-risk all AI systems used to determine access to or denial of essential private and public services and benefits, covering: (5a) AI systems used by… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Law Enforcement (Annex III Point 6)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 6 designates as high-risk AI systems used in law enforcement purposes by competent authorities, covering: (6a) AI systems intended to be used by competent law enforcement… - EU AI Act - High-Risk AI in Migration, Asylum, and Border Control (Annex III Point 7)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Annex III Point 7 designates as high-risk all AI systems used in migration, asylum, and border control management by competent authorities, covering: (7a) AI for individual risk… - EU AI Act - Human Oversight Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems (Article 14)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 14 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to design and develop systems in such a way that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which the… - EU AI Act - Judicial Redress Against Providers and Deployers: Draft Article 81 Remedy Not Retained in Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
The standalone right to an effective judicial remedy against a provider or deployer that appeared in draft versions of the EU AI Act was not retained in the final Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; in the adopted text, Article… - EU AI Act - Market Surveillance, National Competent Authorities, and EU AI Office (Articles 70-86)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 70-86 establish the market surveillance and enforcement governance structure; Article 70 - each Member State must designate one or more national competent authorities… - EU AI Act - Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems (Article 26)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 26 establishes the obligations of deployers - the natural or legal persons who use a high-risk AI system under their authority - for high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III;… - EU AI Act - Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems (Articles 16-20)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 16-20 establish the comprehensive obligations of providers - natural or legal persons who develop or have high-risk AI systems developed and place them on the market or put them… - EU AI Act - Open-Source AI Model Exception Under Article 53(2) and Recital 102
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 53(2) creates a partial exception for providers of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models released under free and open-source licences - exempting them from Article 53(1)(a) technical… - EU AI Act - Penalties, Fines, and Enforcement Framework (Articles 99-101)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 99-101 establish the penalty and enforcement framework for violations; Article 99 establishes the three-tier penalty structure: (1) up to EUR 35,000,000 or 7% of total worldwide… - EU AI Act - Post-Market Surveillance, Monitoring, and Incident Reporting (Articles 61-62)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 61 and 62 establish the post-market surveillance and serious incident reporting framework applicable to high-risk AI system providers - Article 61 requires providers to actively… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on AI Individual Criminal Risk Assessment Based Solely on Profiling (Article 5(1)(d))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(d) prohibits AI systems used by or on behalf of competent authorities, or by Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, to make or assist in making individual risk… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on Biometric Categorisation AI Inferring Sensitive Attributes (Article 5(1)(g))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(g) prohibits the placing on the market, putting into service, or use of AI systems that categorise natural persons individually based on their biometric data to deduce or… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on Emotion Recognition AI in Workplaces and Educational Institutions (Article 5(1)(f))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(f) prohibits the placing on the market, putting into service, or use of AI systems intended to infer emotions of natural persons in the context of the workplace and… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on Real-Time Remote Biometric Identification in Public Spaces for Law Enforcement (Article 5(1)(h))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(h) prohibits the use of real-time remote biometric identification (RTBRI) systems in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement purposes, subject to three strictly… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on Social Scoring AI by Public Authorities (Article 5(1)(c))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(c) prohibits the placing on the market, putting into service, or use of AI systems by public authorities, or on their behalf, that evaluate or classify natural persons or… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on Subliminal AI Manipulation and Exploitation of Vulnerabilities (Articles 5(1)(a) and 5(1)(b))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(a) prohibits AI systems that deploy subliminal techniques beyond a person's consciousness or deceptive techniques that materially distort the behaviour of a person or a… - EU AI Act - Prohibition on Untargeted Scraping of Facial Images to Create Facial Recognition Databases (Article 5(1)(e))
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 5(1)(e) prohibits AI systems that create or expand facial recognition databases through the untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage; applicable… - EU AI Act - Quality Management System Obligations for High-Risk AI Providers (Article 17)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 17 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to put in place a quality management system (QMS) that ensures compliance with the EU AI Act; Article 17(1) - providers of high-risk… - EU AI Act - Right to Explanation for Decisions Made with High-Risk AI Assistance (Article 86)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 86 establishes a right to explanation for individuals significantly affected by decisions made on the basis of high-risk AI system outputs where those decisions produce legal… - EU AI Act - Right to Lodge Complaint and Effective Judicial Remedy (Articles 87-88)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Articles 87-88 establish procedural rights enabling natural persons to challenge AI systems that may violate the Regulation; Article 87 - right to lodge a complaint: any natural person,… - EU AI Act - Risk Management System for High-Risk AI Systems (Article 9)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 9 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to establish, implement, document, and maintain a risk management system throughout the entire lifecycle of the high-risk AI system;… - EU AI Act - SME and Startup-Specific Provisions: Reduced Fees, Sandbox Priority, and Proportionate Compliance
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) includes multiple provisions specifically designed to reduce the compliance burden on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs, as defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC -… - EU AI Act - Technical Documentation Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems (Article 11 and Annex IV)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 11 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to draw up technical documentation before the system is placed on the market or put into service and to keep it up-to-date… - EU AI Act - Transparency and Instructions for Use for High-Risk AI Systems (Article 13)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 13 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to design and develop the systems in such a way as to ensure that their operation is sufficiently transparent to enable deployers to… - EU AI Act - Transparency Obligations for AI Systems Interacting with Natural Persons (Article 50)
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 50 establishes transparency obligations for specific categories of AI systems that interact with natural persons or generate content, applicable from 2 August 2026 (24 months… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 16: Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 16 of the EU AI Act imposes seven mandatory obligations on providers of high-risk AI systems before and during placement on the EU market: (a) establish a compliant quality management system under Article 17;… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 17: Quality Management System Requirements for Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 17 mandates that every provider of a high-risk AI system document and implement a Quality Management System (QMS) proportionate to the organisation's size and the risk level of the AI system. The QMS must… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 18: Technical Documentation Requirements for High-Risk AI System Providers
Article 18 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to draw up Annex IV-compliant technical documentation before placing the system on the market and to keep it up to date throughout the product lifecycle. The… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 20: Automatically Generated Logs and Audit Trail Requirements for High-Risk AI
Article 20 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to design and build in automatic log-keeping capabilities that record the system's operation throughout the entire period of use. These logs must enable post-market… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 21: Cooperation with Competent Authorities by Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 21 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to cooperate with national competent authorities (NCAs) and the AI Office upon request. Cooperation obligations include: providing authorities with all necessary… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 22: Obligations of Authorised Representatives of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 22 requires non-EU providers of high-risk AI systems placed on the EU market to designate - by written mandate - an EU-established authorised representative before market placement. The authorised representative… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 23: Obligations of Importers of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 23 places specific obligations on importers - EU-established entities that place a high-risk AI system from a non-EU provider on the EU market. Before placing the system on the market, importers must verify: (a)… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 24: Obligations of Distributors of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 24 requires distributors - entities in the supply chain that make a high-risk AI system available on the EU market without being the provider or importer - to verify before making the system available that: (a)… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 25: Responsibilities Along the AI Value Chain
Article 25 establishes clear role transitions within the AI value chain that shift provider obligations to other economic operators. An importer or distributor becomes a provider - and assumes all Article 16 provider… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 26: Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Article 26 is the primary compliance article for organisations that use (deploy) high-risk AI systems in their operations. Deployers must: (a) use the system in accordance with the provider's instructions for use; (b)… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 40: Harmonised Standards and Presumption of Conformity for High-Risk AI Systems
Article 40 establishes the presumption of conformity mechanism for high-risk AI systems: a system that complies with harmonised European standards (EN standards) published in the Official Journal of the EU is presumed… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 43: Conformity Assessment Procedures for High-Risk AI Systems
Article 43 specifies two conformity assessment routes for high-risk AI systems before market placement. Route 1 (internal control - Annex VI): providers self-assess against AI Act requirements; applies to all high-risk… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 44: Certificates and EU Declaration of Conformity for High-Risk AI
Article 44 governs EU AI Act certificates issued by notified bodies following Route 2 conformity assessment under Article 43. Certificates must: (a) contain information required by Annex VII; (b) be issued for a maximum… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 57: AI Office Tasks and Responsibilities for GPAI Model Oversight
Article 57 establishes the AI Office - an EU-level body within the European Commission - as the primary supervisor of general-purpose AI (GPAI) model providers in the EU. The AI Office's core tasks include: (a)… - EU AI Act (EU) 2024/1689 - Article 64: Market Surveillance Authority Powers and Enforcement for High-Risk AI
Article 64 grants national market surveillance authorities (NCAs) extensive investigative and corrective powers for high-risk AI system compliance. NCAs may: (a) access all documentation and source code of high-risk AI… - EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Articles 113 and 111(3): Entry into Force, Application Dates and GPAI Transitional Compliance Deadlines
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 applies in general from 2 August 2026, but under Article 113, point (b), Chapter V obligations for providers of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models apply from 2 August 2025, and under Article… - EU AI Act 2024 Article 26 - Deployer Obligations for High-Risk AI Systems
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 26 sets out obligations for deployers of high-risk AI systems. Deployers must use systems in accordance with instructions of use, assign human oversight to qualified persons, monitor… - EU AI Act and Cyber Resilience Act - Dual Compliance for Connected AI Products
Providers of AI systems embedded in connected products face dual compliance obligations under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act) and Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (EU Cyber Resilience Act, CRA); the CRA applies to… - EU AI Act and Medical Devices Regulation - Dual Compliance for AI Medical Devices
AI systems used as medical devices or embedded in medical devices are subject to dual compliance obligations under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act) and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (Medical Devices Regulation, MDR);… - EU AI Act Annex II - Union Harmonisation Legislation for Products in High-Risk AI Classification
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex II lists the Union harmonisation legislation applicable to safety-regulated products whose embedded AI components are automatically classified as high-risk under Article 6(1) - an AI… - EU AI Act Annex III - Exhaustive List of High-Risk AI Systems: Biometrics, Critical Infrastructure, Education, Employment and Public Services
Annex III of the EU AI Act provides an exhaustive list of AI systems considered high-risk across eight critical domains, including biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, and employment. AI systems falling into… - EU AI Act Annex III - High-Risk AI System Use Cases Classification List
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex III enumerates eight categories of high-risk AI system use cases subject to the full requirements of Chapter III: (1) biometric identification and categorisation of natural persons;… - EU AI Act Annex IV - Technical Documentation Content Requirements for High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex IV specifies the mandatory content that providers must include in the technical documentation for high-risk AI systems under Article 11, comprising ten categories of information: (1)… - EU AI Act Annex IX - Information for Registration of High-Risk AI Systems in the EU Database
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex IX specifies the information that providers and deployers must submit when registering high-risk AI systems in the EU database established under Article 60 - the registration… - EU AI Act Annex V - Content Requirements for the EU Declaration of Conformity
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex V specifies the mandatory content that providers must include in the EU declaration of conformity required under Article 47 for high-risk AI systems - the declaration must include:… - EU AI Act Annex VI - Internal Control Conformity Assessment Procedure for High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex VI establishes the internal control conformity assessment procedure under which providers of most high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III may self-certify conformity with Chapter… - EU AI Act Annex VII - Third-Party Conformity Assessment by Notified Bodies for High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex VII establishes the third-party conformity assessment procedure based on assessment of quality management system and assessment of technical documentation, conducted by notified… - EU AI Act Annex VIII - Technical Documentation Requirements for General Purpose AI Models - Compliance Obligations for GPAI Model Documentation, Training Data Disclosure, and Capability Evaluation Documentation Under EU AI Act
This node outlines compliance obligations for General Purpose AI (GPAI) models under EU AI Act Annex VIII, focusing on technical documentation, training data disclosure, and capability evaluation as mandated by… - EU AI Act Annex VIII - Technical Documentation Requirements for General-Purpose AI Models
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Annex VIII specifies the mandatory technical documentation that providers of general-purpose AI (GPAI) models must prepare and maintain under Article 53 - the documentation requirements… - EU AI Act Article 1 - Subject Matter and Purpose
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 1 establishes that the Regulation lays down harmonised rules on the placing on the market, putting into service, and use of AI systems in the Union, aiming to ensure a high level… - EU AI Act Article 101 - Administrative Fines for Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 101 grants the AI Office the power to impose administrative fines directly on providers of general-purpose AI models for infringements of the GPAI-specific obligations under… - EU AI Act Article 101 - Penalties for Providers of GPAI Models with Systemic Risk
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 101 establishes that providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk who infringe the obligations under Article 55 - including failure to conduct model evaluations,… - EU AI Act Article 11 and Annex IV - Technical Documentation for High-Risk AI Systems
Under Article 11 of the EU AI Act, providers of high-risk AI systems must create and maintain comprehensive technical documentation as specified in Annex IV before placing the system on the market. This documentation… - EU AI Act Article 111 - Transitional Provisions for GPAI Models Already on the Market
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 contains transitional provisions for general-purpose AI models that were already placed on the market before 2 August 2025 (12 months after entry into force) - providers of GPAI models… - EU AI Act Article 112 - Evaluation and Review by the Commission
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 112 requires the Commission to evaluate and review the application of the Regulation and submit reports to the European Parliament and the Council, including an evaluation of the… - EU AI Act Article 113 - Entry into Force and Phased Application Dates
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 113 establishes the Regulation's entry into force date of 1 August 2024 and the phased application schedule - prohibited AI practices (Article 5) and AI literacy (Article 4) apply… - EU AI Act Article 12 - Automatic Log-Keeping for High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Article 12 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to ensure their systems automatically generate logs documenting operation including input data references, output results, and system events, retaining… - EU AI Act Article 13 - Transparency and Instructions for Use: Information for Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Under Article 13 of the EU AI Act, providers of high-risk AI systems are mandated to furnish deployers with comprehensive, clear, and concise instructions for use. This documentation must detail the system's identity,… - EU AI Act Article 13 - Transparency and Provision of Information for High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Article 13 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to ensure the systems are sufficiently transparent to enable deployers to interpret the output and use them appropriately. Providers must supply… - EU AI Act Article 15 - Accuracy, Robustness, and Cybersecurity of High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Article 15 requires that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle, with providers specifying accuracy metrics in technical… - EU AI Act Article 16 - Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 16 establishes the comprehensive set of obligations for providers of high-risk AI systems including compliance with risk management, data governance, technical documentation,… - EU AI Act Article 18 - Technical Documentation Obligations for Conformity Assessment
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 18 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to draw up technical documentation in accordance with Annex IV before placing the system on the market, keep it updated throughout the… - EU AI Act Article 2 - Scope of Application
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 2 defines the personal and territorial scope of the Regulation: it applies to providers placing AI systems on the market or putting them into service in the Union regardless of… - EU AI Act Article 2(3) - AI Systems for Defense, National Security, and Military Purposes
EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 2(3) excludes AI systems from the scope of the Regulation where and in so far they are placed on the market, put into service, or used with or without modification exclusively… - EU AI Act Article 20 - Corrective Actions and Information Obligations for Non-Conforming High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 20 requires providers of high-risk AI systems that do not conform to applicable requirements to take corrective actions to bring the system into conformity, withdraw it, or recall… - EU AI Act Article 23 - Obligations of Importers of High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 23 requires importers placing high-risk AI systems on the EU market on behalf of non-EU providers to verify that the provider has conducted a conformity assessment, prepared… - EU AI Act Article 24 - Obligations of Distributors of High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 24 requires distributors of high-risk AI systems to verify that the CE marking is affixed, the EU declaration of conformity and instructions for use are available, and the provider… - EU AI Act Article 25 - Responsibilities Along the AI Value Chain
EU AI Act Article 25 establishes that distributors or deployers who substantially modify a high-risk AI system beyond its intended purpose, or who place their name or trademark on a high-risk AI system, automatically… - EU AI Act Article 3 - Key Definitions for AI Governance Compliance
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 3 provides the definitional framework for the entire Regulation, including the core definitions of 'AI system' (a machine-based system designed to operate with varying levels of… - EU AI Act Article 30 - Notification Procedure for Conformity Assessment Bodies
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 30 establishes the notification procedure through which Member States formally designate and notify the Commission and other Member States about conformity assessment bodies… - EU AI Act Article 31 - Requirements for Notified Bodies
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 31 establishes the mandatory requirements that conformity assessment bodies must meet before they can be designated as notified bodies to conduct third-party conformity assessments… - EU AI Act Article 33 - Subsidiaries and Subcontracting of Notified Bodies
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 33 establishes that where a notified body subcontracts specific conformity assessment activities or uses a subsidiary to perform those activities, it must ensure that the… - EU AI Act Article 34 - Operational Obligations of Notified Bodies
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 34 establishes the operational obligations that notified bodies must comply with when conducting third-party conformity assessments of high-risk AI systems, requiring that they… - EU AI Act Article 34 - Tasks of Notified Bodies
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 34 establishes that notified bodies must carry out the conformity assessment activities for which they are notified, that they must assess provider applications for conformity… - EU AI Act Article 35 - NANDO Notification and Notified Body Identification Numbers
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 35 requires the Commission to maintain and make publicly available an updated list of notified bodies designated under the Regulation, including each notified body's identification… - EU AI Act Article 36 - Changes to Notifications of Notified Bodies
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 36 establishes that the notifying authority must notify the Commission and other Member States of any changes to the notification of a notified body including restrictions,… - EU AI Act Article 39 - Conformity Assessment Bodies from Third Countries
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 39 provides that conformity assessment bodies established in third countries may be designated as notified bodies under the Regulation only where a bilateral agreement between the… - EU AI Act Article 4 - AI Literacy Obligations for Providers and Deployers
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 4 requires providers and deployers of AI systems to take measures to ensure, to the best of their ability, a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff and all other persons… - EU AI Act Article 40 - Harmonised Standards and Presumption of Conformity
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 40 establishes that high-risk AI systems complying with harmonised standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EU) 1025/2012 and cited in the Official Journal are presumed to conform… - EU AI Act Article 40 - Harmonised Standards and Presumption of Conformity
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 40 establishes that high-risk AI systems complying with harmonised standards whose references are published in the Official Journal of the European Union shall be presumed to… - EU AI Act Article 41 - Common Specifications for High-Risk AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 41 empowers the Commission to adopt implementing acts establishing common specifications for the requirements of Chapter III Title II where harmonised standards under Article 40 do… - EU AI Act Article 42 - Presumption of Conformity with Certain Requirements
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 42 establishes that high-risk AI systems that have been trained and tested on data reflecting the specific geographical, contextual, and functional settings in which they will be… - EU AI Act Article 46 - Derogation from Conformity Assessment Procedures
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 46 provides an exceptional derogation procedure allowing market surveillance authorities to authorise the placing on the market or putting into service of specific high-risk AI… - EU AI Act Article 47 - EU Declaration of Conformity
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 47 requires providers of high-risk AI systems to draw up a written EU declaration of conformity confirming that the system fulfils all applicable EU AI Act requirements, that the… - EU AI Act Article 48 - CE Marking Affixation Rules and Restrictions
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 48 establishes that the CE conformity marking for high-risk AI systems must be affixed visibly, legibly, and indelibly before the AI system is placed on the market or put into… - EU AI Act Article 5 Prohibited AI Practices Compliance Node
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Article 5 prohibits specific AI practices deemed unacceptable. These include deploying AI systems using subliminal techniques to materially distort a person's behavior in a manner that causes… - EU AI Act Article 50 - Transparency Obligations for Certain AI Systems
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 50 requires providers of AI systems that interact directly with natural persons to ensure those persons are informed they are interacting with an AI system, requires providers and… - EU AI Act Article 51 - Classification of GPAI Models with Systemic Risk
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 51 establishes that a general-purpose AI model is classified as a GPAI model with systemic risk where it is trained using a total computing power of more than 10^25 floating point… - EU AI Act Article 53 - Obligations for Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 53 establishes baseline obligations for all providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the EU market, requiring them to draw up and maintain technical documentation specified… - EU AI Act Article 54 - Authorised Representatives of GPAI Model Providers
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 54 requires providers of general-purpose AI models established outside the European Union who make their models available in the EU to appoint an authorised representative… - EU AI Act Article 55 - Obligations for General-Purpose AI Models with Systemic Risk
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 55 imposes additional obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models that are designated as posing systemic risk - specifically those trained with compute exceeding 10^25… - EU AI Act Article 56 - GPAI Model Codes of Practice
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 56 requires the AI Office to facilitate the drawing up of codes of practice by providers of GPAI models and other stakeholders, covering the technical, operational, and governance… - EU AI Act Article 57 - AI Regulatory Sandboxes
EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689 Article 57 requires Member States to establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox at national level, that sandboxes provide a controlled environment in which AI systems can be developed,…
+ 588 more nodes in this pillar — see the full registry at /intelligence or the discovery index at /api/v1/nodes/index.json.